2024-09-14T01:25:36  *** teepee_ is now known as teepee
2024-09-14T12:04:31  <acidsys> hellcp LCP maybe?
2024-09-14T12:06:01  <matrix-o-o> <LCP> hm?
2024-09-14T12:06:10  <acidsys> can you ban the user in -chat ?
2024-09-14T12:06:15  <acidsys> and maybe purge the content
2024-09-14T12:06:35  <acidsys> on matrix I mean
2024-09-14T12:06:59  <acidsys> (also, sorry to ruin your saturday)
2024-09-14T12:07:59  <acidsys> or maybe temporarily lock the room
2024-09-14T12:12:06  <matrix-o-o> <LCP> I love getting 429: Too Many Requests in this situation, it's my favourite
2024-09-14T12:12:20  <acidsys> oh ugh
2024-09-14T12:13:11  <matrix-o-o> <LCP> this is why your messaging platform should have an endpoint for mass removal
2024-09-14T12:14:01  <matrix-o-o> <LCP> if you are ever in a situation where you are designing the next chat protocol, think of the users
2024-09-14T12:15:50  <acidsys> does purge_up_to_event or purge_up_to_ts in the api not do something like this ?
2024-09-14T12:18:30  <matrix-o-o> <LCP> well, if it does, then I don't see why element's "remove all user's messages" doesn't use that endpoint
2024-09-14T12:21:04  <acidsys> oh I see, didn't know there was any of such functionality in element
2024-09-14T12:24:25  <matrix-o-o> <LCP> it's going though, I have things to do unfortunately so I can't really baby it right now
2024-09-14T12:24:50  <acidsys> ok something I can check or it's in your client?
2024-09-14T12:25:30  <matrix-o-o> <LCP> it's client side sadly
2024-09-14T12:26:00  <acidsys> ah ok, then I'll be patient. thanks for the quick help!
2024-09-14T12:51:58  <matrix-o-o> <Richard Rahl> Is there a way for me to ignore whole servers? The person tries to invite now people
2024-09-14T12:52:23  <matrix-o-o> <Richard Rahl> Or is there a server option?
2024-09-14T12:53:26  <matrix-o-o> <Richard Rahl> Lol, you cant even ignore that person without accepting the invite....
2024-09-14T13:29:21  <matrix-o-o> <Richard Rahl> Chat again
2024-09-14T13:33:52  <matrix-o-o> <LCP> I have noticed
2024-09-14T13:38:44  <matrix-o-o> <phoenix> Richard Rahl: There should be a Reject & Ignore option. At least that's what showed up on my unwanted invites.
2024-09-14T13:40:00  <matrix-o-o> <phoenix> Richard Rahl: https://matrix.org/docs/older/moderation/ suggests there are room ACL for blocking whole servers, but that's the most what is possible
2024-09-14T13:40:32  <matrix-o-o> <phoenix> Section "Banning servers from rooms (Server ACLs)"
2024-09-14T13:41:00  <matrix-o-o> <Richard Rahl> phoenix: for me only reject exists. And i cant put them on the ignore, because i need to click on their profile which you cant if you dont accept
2024-09-14T13:41:05  <matrix-o-o> <Richard Rahl> Element mobile
2024-09-14T13:41:33  <matrix-o-o> <phoenix> In https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/issues/3173 people asked already for a server block/defederation, but it was closed because it appears to be impossible to implement
2024-09-14T13:41:56  <matrix-o-o> <phoenix> I was on Element Web, there was a button for it.
2024-09-14T13:42:29  <matrix-o-o> <Richard Rahl> How is that impossible to implement when mastodon can do it oO
2024-09-14T13:43:38  <matrix-o-o> <phoenix> Precisely my thoughts. Am a bit disappointed in synapse's moderation capabilities.
2024-09-14T13:44:10  <matrix-o-o> <phoenix> A server block seems to be possible however on a per room basis via ACLs.
2024-09-14T13:44:16  <matrix-o-o> <Richard Rahl> I mean matrix.org is already very thinly moderated
2024-09-14T13:44:53  <matrix-o-o> <phoenix> Yeah ....
2024-09-14T13:44:57  <matrix-o-o> <Richard Rahl> Yeah getting to a point of going back to irc
2024-09-14T13:45:57  * acidsys waves
2024-09-14T13:46:53  <matrix-o-o> <phoenix> 😂
2024-09-14T13:47:24  <matrix-o-o> <Richard Rahl> So how do i get my cloak ^^?
2024-09-14T13:47:43  <acidsys> are you an openSUSE member?
2024-09-14T13:47:58  <matrix-o-o> <Richard Rahl> Yes
2024-09-14T13:49:14  <acidsys> found it
2024-09-14T13:49:39  <acidsys> rrahl0 is registered by you on libera?
2024-09-14T13:50:42  <matrix-o-o> <Richard Rahl> Yws
2024-09-14T13:50:45  <matrix-o-o> <Richard Rahl> Yes
2024-09-14T14:23:50  <matrix-o-o> <LCP> we could technically just block any traffic from that instance, but that sounds painful
2024-09-14T14:24:09  <matrix-o-o> <LCP> though, considering today, probably worth exploring
2024-09-14T14:24:16  <acidsys> LCP: I already blackholed it
2024-09-14T14:24:29  <matrix-o-o> <LCP> cool
2024-09-14T14:24:32  <matrix-o-o> <Richard Rahl> Yeah wanted to say. Very much worth it
2024-09-14T14:24:54  <acidsys> RichardRahl: cloak is done
2024-09-14T14:25:17  <matrix-o-o> <Richard Rahl> Thank you very much
2024-09-14T14:26:27  <acidsys> that is the address behind tzchat.org and the one behind tezos.modular.im (which showed in its .well-known/matrix/server), if any others let me know
2024-09-14T14:28:53  <acidsys> I also looked into contacting the operator of this homeserver to consider removing that user but they don't seem to have a way of contact besides one private person I found on GitHub and a matrix room
2024-09-14T14:30:33  <acidsys> going by logs, there seems to be only one other user on that homeserver interacting with ours, so not a huge loss I guess for a temporary measure
2024-09-14T17:39:11  *** teepee_ is now known as teepee
2024-09-14T17:57:46  <matrix-o-o> <phoenix> acidsys: If I might ask: how? Is there a way in synapse or just IP block?
2024-09-14T17:58:24  <matrix-o-o> <phoenix> I'm looking for a way to block that whole server from my homeserver as well, that's why I'm asking.
2024-09-14T18:15:54  <acidsys> phoenix: `ip r a blackhole <address>`
2024-09-14T18:16:37  <acidsys> better is to add it to our nftables blackhole though, but just did it quickly earlier
2024-09-14T18:27:29  <matrix-o-o> <phoenix> Thnx, will do the same.
2024-09-14T18:54:55  <matrix-o-o> <Ernst Persson> acidsys: the bugzilla situation is pretty sad...
2024-09-14T19:19:32  <acidsys> ErnstPersson: I agree
2024-09-14T19:22:04  <acidsys> I repeatedly complained about it to the board, but they seem to lack any authority. I also ask about it internally, but that's more slow progress and the branding confusion does not help.
2024-09-14T19:24:37  <cboltz> I dont really know how the branding confusion (if that exists at all) relates to bugzilla
2024-09-14T19:24:50  <cboltz> are you saying it would help if people comlain about issues with the "SUSE Bugzilla" instead of the "openSUSE Bugzilla"? ;-)
2024-09-14T19:27:38  <acidsys> It does not help when having a little bit of good hope into a direction gets then questioned by "will that still be relevant if there is no openSUSE anymore?"
2024-09-14T19:28:19  <acidsys> (of course, it will be, and people understand that, but it adds unnecessary discussion material)
2024-09-14T19:29:21  <cboltz> sounds like one more reason to send this silly idea of renaming openSUSE to /dev/null ;-)
2024-09-14T20:17:53  <matrix-o-o> <Conan Kudo> It's not silly, but this isn't the place for that discussion.
2024-09-14T20:37:14  <matrix-o-o> <ctlinux> cboltz: That would make for rather quiet heroes meetings...
2024-09-14T20:42:06  <matrix-o-o> <knurpht - Gertjan> acidsys: can you also please remove the subscription(s) of normand@linux.vnet.ibm.com
2024-09-14T20:42:15  <acidsys> which list ?
2024-09-14T20:42:44  <acidsys> ok, have it